David Miranda in legal challenge over seized data
David Miranda was in transit when he was detained at Heathrow Airport
David
Miranda, the man held at Heathrow for nine hours on Sunday, is taking
legal action to prevent the police from examining the electronic items
seized.
Mr Miranda, the partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, was held at the airport under the Terrorism Act.
His solicitors say he is challenging the legality of his detention.
The Home Office has defended the detention, saying police
must act if they think someone has "stolen information that would help
terrorism".
Law firm Bindmans have written to the home secretary and Met
Police commissioner for assurances "there will be no inspection,
copying, disclosure, transfer, distribution or interference, in any way,
with our client's data pending determination of our client's claim".
'Duty to protect'
The detention of Mr Miranda, 28, has been condemned by senior
British politicians, human rights organisations and the Brazilian
authorities.
The UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, David
Anderson QC, has said the length of detention was "unusual" and will
meet police later.
Brazilian Mr Miranda was held at Heathrow on his way from Berlin to Rio de Janeiro - where he lives with Mr Greenwald.
The reporter has broken most of the stories about state
surveillance based on the leaks from fugitive Edward Snowden, who used
to work at the US National Security Agency.
Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger: "l think it is suspicious that he was stopped at Heathrow..."
Mr Miranda was detained under schedule 7
of the Terrorism Act 2000. This allows police to hold someone at an
airport, port or international rail station for up to nine hours for
questioning about whether they have been involved with acts of
terrorism.
Scotland Yard maintained that its use of the Terrorism Act to detain Mr Miranda was "legally and procedurally sound".
A Home Office spokesperson said: "The government and the police have a duty to protect the public and our national security.
"If the police believe that an individual is in possession of
highly sensitive stolen information that would help terrorism, then
they should act and the law provides them with a framework to do that.
Those who oppose this sort of action need to think about what they are
condoning."
'Worldwide outcry'
Mr Miranda claimed he was held for nine hours by agents who
questioned him about his "entire life" and took his computer, video
games, mobile phone and memory cards.
In Germany, Mr Miranda had been staying with US film-maker
Laura Poitras, who has also been working on the Snowden files with Mr
Greenwald and the Guardian.
The paper said Mr Miranda was stopped while he was "ferrying materials" between his partner and Ms Poitras.
In an interview with the BBC, Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger
said there had been a "worldwide outcry" at the use of the Terrorism
Act to hold Mr Miranda.
"This act enables people to interrogate people for up to nine hours and seize all their belongings with no checks and balances."
The US government has said British officials gave it a "heads
up" about Mr Miranda's detention but said the decision to seize him was
a British one taken "independent of our direction".